miniphim · longevity · markers · built 2026-10-12 by Morphyx

Aging clocks and markers: what links them to lifespan

The main page counts only lifespan. This page catalogues what that page leaves out: the clocks and markers that stand in for lifespan, because nobody can wait 80 years for a human result. For each one it gives the link to lifespan it's supposed to carry, and how far that link has been tested.

Every claim below quotes its source's archived abstract, and the build stops if a quote isn't there. Abstracts are what the authors chose to put first. A full-text reading could add to a row, but it shouldn't contradict one.

The ladder

  1. tracks age. It changes with chronological age, or was trained to.
  2. predicts death. In people followed forward, it predicts death or disease beyond what age alone does.
  3. causal test. Genetics (MR) or a direct manipulation asks whether the marker itself drives the outcome.
  4. movable in a trial. A randomized trial has moved it.
  5. moving it moved outcomes. A randomized trial moved it AND changed hard outcomes. Only this rung makes a surrogate.

Predicting is not causing, and causing is not the same as being safe to push. A marker can predict death because it is a gauge (CRP: genetics says it doesn't cause heart disease), or because it is a lever pulled the wrong way (HbA1c: pushed too low, more people died). Only rung 4 tells you that changing the marker changes the outcome.

The table

Green yes, red no, yellow mixed, grey open. Hover over a cell for the finding, or read the details further down. An empty cell means not shown in the sources archived here, which is not the same as untested.

marker0
tracks age
1
predicts death
2
causal test
3
movable in a trial
4
moving it moved outcomes
Horvath pan-tissue clock
DNAm clock (1st generation)
yesyes
Hannum blood clock
DNAm clock (1st generation)
yesyes
PhenoAge (DNAm)
DNAm clock (2nd generation)
yesno
GrimAge
DNAm clock (2nd generation)
yesno
DunedinPACE
DNAm pace-of-aging (3rd generation)
yesyesopen
Proteomic aging clock (204 proteins)
plasma protein clock
yes
Organ-specific proteomic ages
plasma protein clock, per organ
yes
Telomere length
chromosome-end length
mixed
Senescent cells (p16Ink4a+)
cell-state marker
yes
Clonal hematopoiesis (CHIP)
somatic mutation in blood
yesyes
C-reactive protein (CRP)
inflammation marker
yesno
Frailty index
count of deficits
yesyes
Gait speed
physical function
yes
Grip strength
physical function
yesopen
Cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2max, METs)
physical function
yes
LDL cholesterol
blood lipid (comparison row)
yes
Systolic blood pressure
vital sign (comparison row)
yes
HbA1c
blood sugar average (comparison row)
no

What the table says

Of the 15 aging markers, 0 reach rung 4. Counting each by the highest rung it has been tested at: 3 at rung 3, 3 at rung 2, 9 at rung 1, and 0 only at rung 0. Rung 1 is where most of the field stands: many markers predict death well, and none has been shown to be a target. The highest rung any clock reaches is 3: DunedinPACE was slowed by calorie restriction in a randomized trial, and the effect was small. In that same trial, PhenoAge and GrimAge, the two clocks built to predict death, didn't move. So which clock you use decides whether a trial "worked".

The strongest causal result belongs to a marker, not a clock: removing p16+ senescent cells extended lifespan in mice. The cleanest warning comes from outside aging: HbA1c is an FDA-accepted surrogate, and pushing it too low raised deaths.

The three comparison rows (LDL, blood pressure, HbA1c) show what rung 4 takes: tens of thousands of people randomized, and years of counting deaths. That is the bill no aging clock has paid. TAME was designed to be a step toward paying it and has not been funded.

Who decides what counts

In the US, the FDA decides which markers can stand in for outcomes in drug approval. It keeps a public table of surrogate endpoints. LDL, blood pressure and HbA1c are on it, each tied to a disease. No aging clock, frailty index or telomere measure is, and aging itself isn't a disease the table lists. (Read 2026-10-12. The page says "Content current as of 04/29/2026". FDA's server refused our archiver, so this one is read, not archived.) No clock can be the endpoint of an approval trial until it is on that table, so a company with a clock sells it to consumers or to researchers, not to a regulator. The researchers' own response is a consensus effort to set standards (the Biomarkers of Aging Consortium; Cell 2023), which opens with the current lack of standards and consensus on the properties of a reliable aging biomarker.

One more caution on measurement: technical noise produces deviations up to 9 years between replicates for six prominent epigenetic clocks (Nature Aging 2022). The same paper offers principal-component versions that agree within 1.5 years. A single clock reading from a single sample can be off by years before any biology enters.

Every marker, in detail

Horvath pan-tissue clock DNAm clock (1st generation)

The proposed link: DNA methylation age measures the work of an "epigenetic maintenance system"; a clock running ahead of the calendar would mean that system is wearing out faster.

Hannum blood clock DNAm clock (1st generation)

The proposed link: Each person's methylome ages at a rate, and a faster rate is a faster-aging body.

PhenoAge (DNAm) DNAm clock (2nd generation)

The proposed link: Trained on a clinical score that predicts death, not on calendar age, so the methylation it picks up should be the part that matters for lifespan.

GrimAge DNAm clock (2nd generation)

The proposed link: Methylation stand-ins for seven plasma proteins and for smoking pack-years, combined into a "predictor of lifespan".

DunedinPACE DNAm pace-of-aging (3rd generation)

The proposed link: Not "how old" but "how fast": trained on 20 years of decline in 19 organ measures in one 1972–73 birth cohort.

Proteomic aging clock (204 proteins) plasma protein clock

The proposed link: The blood's protein mix shifts with age across many organ systems, so a protein age ahead of the calendar flags a body ahead of the calendar.

Organ-specific proteomic ages plasma protein clock, per organ

The proposed link: Organs age at different speeds in one person; proteins shed by one organ date that organ.

Telomere length chromosome-end length

The proposed link: Telomeres shorten with each division, so short telomeres were read as a worn-out body and long ones as a young one.

Senescent cells (p16Ink4a+) cell-state marker

The proposed link: Cells that stop dividing but keep secreting inflammatory signals pile up with age and damage the tissue around them.

Clonal hematopoiesis (CHIP) somatic mutation in blood

The proposed link: Blood stem cells with cancer-linked mutations take over a share of the blood, and those cells may drive vessel disease as well as cancer.

C-reactive protein (CRP) inflammation marker

The proposed link: "Inflammaging": low-grade inflammation rises with age and drives disease.

Frailty index count of deficits

The proposed link: Aging is the accumulation of many small failures, so the share of deficits a person has reflects how close they are to death, whichever deficits they are.

Gait speed physical function

The proposed link: Walking speed integrates heart, lungs, muscle, nerves and balance, so it reads the whole system at once.

Grip strength physical function

The proposed link: Muscle strength stands for the body's reserve.

Cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2max, METs) physical function

The proposed link: Peak oxygen use sets how much the whole body can do.

LDL cholesterol blood lipid (comparison row)

The proposed link: Not an aging marker. It is here as the template: what a validated surrogate looks like.

Systolic blood pressure vital sign (comparison row)

The proposed link: Not an aging marker; a second validated surrogate.

HbA1c blood sugar average (comparison row)

The proposed link: Not an aging marker. It is here as the warning: an accepted surrogate, moved hard, and more people died.

Abbreviations

ITP
Interventions Testing Program. The NIA's mouse lifespan program: each compound is tested at three sites (Jackson Laboratory, University of Michigan, UT Health San Antonio) on genetically mixed mice, and the failures are published too.
NIA
National Institute on Aging. The US federal institute (part of NIH) that funds the ITP.
NIH
National Institutes of Health. The US federal medical research agency.
MPD
Mouse Phenome Database. The Jackson Laboratory's public database. Its ITP center page is where the cohort table here comes from.
UM-HET3
University of Michigan heterogeneous stock, 4-way cross. The ITP's mouse: each animal is a genetically different grandchild of four inbred strains, so a result can't ride on one strain's quirks.
NR
nicotinamide riboside. A vitamin B3 form, sold as an NAD+ booster.
NAD+
nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide. A coenzyme whose levels fall with age in some tissues.
AKG
alpha-ketoglutarate. A metabolite of the citric acid cycle.
NDGA
nordihydroguaiaretic acid. A plant-derived antioxidant; in the ITP it extended lifespan in males only, in both cohorts that tested it.
CI
confidence interval. Here, 95% Clopper–Pearson: the range of true rates that the count can't rule out.
HR
hazard ratio. How much faster the event (here usually death) happens in one group than another. 1.4 means 40% faster at any moment.
RR
risk ratio. Risk in one group divided by risk in another.
SD
standard deviation
RCT
randomized controlled trial. Chance, not the participant or doctor, decides who gets the intervention. The only design here that can show moving a marker causes the outcome.
MR
Mendelian randomization. Using gene variants that raise or lower a marker from birth as a natural experiment: if people born with higher levels don't get more disease, the marker probably isn't the cause.
DNAm
DNA methylation. Methyl groups on DNA, read at CpG sites. Most epigenetic clocks are weighted sums of these.
CpG
cytosine–phosphate–guanine site. A place in DNA where a C is followed by a G; the usual site of methylation.
CHIP
clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential. A blood stem cell carrying a cancer-linked mutation that has expanded into a visible share of the blood, without cancer.
CRP
C-reactive protein. A liver protein that rises with inflammation.
LDL
low-density lipoprotein (cholesterol)
HbA1c
glycated hemoglobin. The share of hemoglobin with glucose stuck to it; a 2–3 month average of blood sugar.
CHD
coronary heart disease
CALERIE
Comprehensive Assessment of Long-term Effects of Reducing Intake of Energy. A 2-year randomized trial of 25% calorie restriction in adults without obesity.
PURE
Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology study. A cohort of about 140,000 people in 17 countries.
SPRINT
Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial
ACCORD
Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes
TAME
Targeting Aging with Metformin. A proposed human trial of about 3,000 people; not fully funded.
FDA
US Food and Drug Administration. It decides which markers count as surrogate endpoints for drug approval.
doi
digital object identifier. A permanent link to a paper: https://doi.org/ followed by the number.

Sources (archived, sha256)

Built by research/longevity/markers.mjs, which checks every hash and every quote. Abstracts are from Europe PMC.